Blog about Russia, Soviet Union, Olympics and artistic gymnastics. News and interviews on gymnastics champions, coaches and competitions.

Sunday, April 14, 2013

Who's the best? Guest post from coach Jim Holt

Jim Holt, men's head coach in Scotland, commented rather usefully on my post of 9 April regarding three dimensions of the nature of human movement, which I will partially summarise below.  Jim has now added to this with a video exercise in judgement ... please join in the conversation by adding your comments! 

At root, if we think of gymnastics as �human motion� and we recognize that even the various pieces of apparatus have evolved over a somewhat random development, regardless of the nature of the apparatus, if we agree that gymnastics is (and its rules evaluate or compare some measures of ) �human movement�, then the 3 (and only 3!) aspect of same that are measured are :
1 (THE fundamental one) � economy of line or movement
2 Complexity of movement
3 One�s ability to overcome the forces of time and/or gravity (a subset of time in this context).
1    Economy : a straight arm felge handstand is better than a bent arm, not because it is more difficult, although it is, but because it has a better line (i.e. fewer angles � a layout is better than a pike is better than a tuck because of the same principle).
 

 2    Complexity: double double back salto is better IN PRINCIPLE than a full-in which is better than a double � which is better than a single � not because they are harder, but because axiomatically due to our second principle
 

3   A 10 second cross (or high high back salto on floor) is better than a 3 second cross/low flip because we can measure principle #3. 
 
... 
 

Now, to a specific � �elegance� and the �aesthetic� underlie everything about principle #1, economy of line or motion � my personal objection to gymnastics as it has evolved in the 21st century is the blind worship (or less inflammatorily put) belief that �additive complexity� is the direction that gymnastics should go �

Elegance is elegance because it implicitly illustrates a harmony and efficiency in a movement (any movement) that inelegance does not � a Ferrari idling is more elegant than a Hyundai idling, not because it has a higher top-end speed, but because its combination of form and function make it more harmonious, efficient � et al.

Who has the best exercise/elements here? What's the best and WHY?




Or this guy?



Maybe this guy?



Everybody knows this guy



So what do you see? Which is the best? (Not every skill on the best routine is the best, by the way ...). Now the important question ... WHY is it the best?


0 comments:

Post a Comment